Supreme Court Orders

(ORDER LIST: 548 U.S.)

MONDAY, JULY 31, 2006

REHEARINGS DENIED

05-1002 SHAW, WALTER M. V. SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CA
05-1166 ALLY, ACKLEEMA V. GRAVER, RICHARD S., ET AL.
05-1504 EDWARDS, EDWIN, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
05-7919 JAAKKOLA, JOHN J. V. GOTHAM, ROY D., ET AL.
05-8856 DIXON, FRANKIE L. V. BARNHART, COMM'R, SOCIAL SEC.
05-9396 SHERMAN, JOSEPH H. V. RYAN, ACTING WARDEN
05-9397 REDFORD, MIKE J. V. HAMIL, JUDGE, ETC.
05-9441 STRAMAGLIA, MICHAEL A. V. FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY
05-9446 BUNCH, JAMES A. G. V. NC DOC, ET AL.
05-9480 WILSON, MASON L. V. NICHOLSON, SEC. OF VA
05-9552 MICHAEL, LINDA V. McDONOUGH, INT. SEC., FL DOC
05-9559 FOX, CHERUNDA V. YUKINS, WARDEN, ET AL.
05-9572 STRAHAN, KEVIN L. V. MICHIGAN
05-9606 SALAR, SAM V. MESA POLICE DEPT., ET AL.
05-9615 PICKETT, NORMAN C. V. McCLINTOCK, ANN
05-9626 THORPE, EARNEST V. OHIO
05-9643 BAKER, EDWARD E. V. COTO, ALEXANDER, ET AL.
05-9680 LANE-EL, JOHN R. V. KNIGHT, STANLEY
05-9734 GREENE, TINA L. V. FLDDSO, ET AL.
05-9772 CLARK, DANIEL L. V. UNITED STATES
05-9884 KANDEKORE, LIJYASU V. FLORIDA BAR
05-9894 TALBOTT, KENNETH V. CA DOC, ET AL.
05-9940 GLENN, DEBORAH V. SABA, REZA
05-9990 IN RE CAROLYN FOOSE
05-9995 GAFFNEY, JOHNNY R. V. McDONOUGH, INT. SEC., FL DOC
05-10001 HANN, GARY S. V. STATE TREASURER
05-10033 HARRINGTON, ANDREE V. DC DEPT. OF EMPLOY. SERVICES
05-10034 HAYNES, LARRY V. FLORIDA
05-10050 IN RE JAMES E. BOWELL
05-10060 POINDEXTER, ROBERT E. V. CIR
05-10126 REEVES, ELIZABETH A. V. ST. MARY'S COUNTY COMM'R, ET AL.
05-10131 MOORE, BEVERLY A. V. EGAN, LISETTE, ET AL.
05-10194 KENNEDY, MONTEZ V. SMITH, BRAD, ET AL.
05-10197 WARMUS, THOMAS A. V. UNITED STATES
05-10218 WEST, TYRONE V. STOUFFER, WARDEN, ET AL.
05-10219 VOHRA, DEEPAK V. ORANGE COUNTY, CA, ET AL.
05-10241 MESINA, ROMAN C. V. UNITED STATES
05-10276 IN RE GUY HAMMOND
05-10298 JONES, COMPTON V. UNITED STATES
05-10310 IN RE STEPHEN M. MITCHELL
05-10321 HOWARD, GREGORY T. V. KOZAK, CYNTHIA M., ET AL.
05-10336 WILLIAMS, ALBERT V. UNITED STATES
05-10337 ACKERMAN, JOYCE L. V. ASSURANT, INC., ET AL.
05-10417 FADLALLAH, ALI V. DEARBORN PUBLIC SCHOOLS
05-10421 HAIRSTON, ARTHUR L. V. UNITED STATES
05-10568 BUSTILLO, FERNANDO V. HOOD, WARDEN
05-10578 HUMPHREY, MONTEL V. UNITED STATES
05-10918 IN RE GENE A. GUINN

The petitions for rehearing are denied.

05-348 COMFORT, SAMANTHA J., ET AL. V. LYNN SCHOOL COMMITTEE, ET AL.
05-5957 KANDEKORE, LIJYASU V. USDC SD FL
05-8413 MANESS, BRET F. V. UNITED STATES

The motions for leave to file petitions for rehearing are denied.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE

D-2427 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF CYRENA ANN TELESFORD

Cyrena Ann Telesford, of Brooklyn, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2428 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF JOHN ANTHONY TARTAGLIA

John Anthony Tartaglia, of Bedford, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2429 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF TODD SIMON STALL

Todd Simon Stall, of Poughkeepsie, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2430 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF STUART W. KESSLER

Stuart W. Kessler, of Key West, Florida, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2431 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF WILHEMENA LAWRENCE MITCHELL

Wilhemena Lawrence Mitchell, of Englewood, Colorado, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2432 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF STEVEN G. ROTHENBERG

Steven G. Rothenberg, of Kingston, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2433 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF DANIEL MARTIN BOYAR

Daniel Martin Boyar, of Dunnellon, Florida, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2434 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF DAVID A. BARRETT

David A. Barrett, of Tallahassee, Florida, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2435 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF JEFFREY DAVID KNICKMEIER

Jeffrey David Knickmeier, of McFarland, Wisconsin, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2436 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF MAC TRUONG

Mac Truong, of New York, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2437 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF EDWARD STUART REICH

Edward Stuart Reich, of Otisville, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2438 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF CLIFTON S. FULLER, JR.

Clifton S. Fuller, Jr., of Atlanta, Georgia, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.